• Home
  • About
  • Books
  • Anthologies
  • Awards
  • Contact
  • Archive
  • Un-PC Un-polarized Blog
CHARLOTTE R. MENDEL
Follow Charlotte on Facebook

Lessons learned in my quest to develop an influential script for climate change

9/5/2022

2 Comments

 
DDL is this lovely property near Tatamagouche owned by Shambhala. I volunteered there for the month of July, during an intensive month-long practice called a Dathun. I never got so much appreciation for doing the same things I’ve done all my life (cooking and gardening) and that phenomenon I‘ve noticed—where people hate my guts or adore me and I have no idea why? Well, I was riding high in DDL; luckily, my hubris wasn’t affected by the admiration! Hate or love—you just don’t know me. I’m the most selfish person you have ever met. I am only doing this because I was a shit mother and wife and a total failure as a writer and teacher, so I need to find SOMETHING where I might do some actual good. 😊
 
So in DDL I continued my mission in life. In case there is still doubt about what that is—the biggest crisis that humanity has ever faced is coming. Experts tell us that there is time to avoid the worst, so I’m like, yeah, let’s do it.
Our children will judge us on what we do today, because they will be living with the consequences. Your legacy depends on what you choose to do this decade. Plus it’s really a privilege to live in a time when what we do makes a difference.

But when I spout this stuff, the worst ignore me and the best seem to either get defensive, or overflow with admiration. For the first two cases, I have to work on a script that won’t offend; that’s my current mission—to find the right words. It really doesn’t matter what you do, so long as you take the crisis into account when you make your decisions. Love steak? Stuff your face with it, as far as I’m concerned. But if you gobble meat AND travel several times a year AND consume like you always have—in short, if you aren’t modifying your life in any way—then you’re either unprincipled or ignorant. Should we start a whole new shame culture? Instead of people ooh-ing and ahh-ing when you post photos of your second trip of the year (we’re all allowed one) then we could shame you publicly. 😊 Small houses will be applauded and monsters condemned. Huge cars will…you get the picture. It’s coming, believe me.
 
So at DDL I approached every person individually and engaged in climate conversations, with various results. There were a couple of young people who agreed that it was time for eco-terrorism (and here I thought I was being extreme)! Boomers ranged from hubris-ridden speeches about how it was too late to various versions of ‘fuck you’. The trigger for this usually happened when I earnestly tried to float the idea that I would fight happily beside a Nazi in the war against the climate crisis.
“Am I going to invest energy arguing about whether I am inferior to another person, if by shutting up I increase the chances of saving my own children?” I say with irrefutable logic.
“What are you saying?”
“I’m saying when you’re in a war for survival nothing else matters. I’m saying if we could just put aside the differences that polarize us…”
“Are you actually saying that a reprehensible racist…”
“…who is fighting the crisis because he loves his children, as even reprehensible racists are wont to do…”
“I’m Jewish and my kid is trans. FUCK YOU.”

Yup, Dalhousie thinks just like you, which is why they fired me. We’re hurtling towards suicide but wait! Pronouns, pronouns! Reminds me of the looney-tunes feeling I got in the lead-up to Trump’s election. He was busy praising dictators and insulting visible minorities, women, the disabled, the grieving parents of a dead soldier, and the media was saying, hey, what about Clinton’s emails? This guy is totally insane but…emails! Emails!
 
Anyway, I’m Jewish and if trans mean you want to be the opposite sex I’m that too. Of course it was a French person who showed me the light—those romantic frogs. They were talking about happiness. Ever heard the word “happiness” in a French accent? That’s right, they drop the ‘H’ and stress the second syllable—aka, “a-penis”. I feel that my trajectory in life would have been very different if I’d had one of them, but never lose hope—if the Buddhists are right about reincarnation I might strike lucky next time. Oh, to experience the feeling that produces that scrunched-up focus on their faces when they penetrate! The best I can do is a one-second orgasm after an hour of diddling.
 
Another Dathun participant wrote a long letter stating the negative facts we all know under the mistaken belief that his brilliant argument for hopelessness would create admiration. But he was unable to hear the hope that I am trying to instil (if we all pull together, we can totally do this, but each and every one of us has a personal responsibility to transition away from consumerism and fossil fuels).
 
Towards the end, I asked if I could speak to the head teacher, despite the fact that he was much sought-after—the Buddhists certainly admire their teachers (I have no doubt that if I had been a Buddhist teacher I would have started to think my jizz was divine too--come back Sakyong--it's not your fault!).
Anyway, I digress: this wonderful person listened to me with absolute attention, and at the end of my monologue when I asked, “So if you agree that this is the biggest crisis humans will face and trust the experts who tell us there is time to reverse it, then why don’t you incorporate it into your teachings?”
 
He looked at me and said, “Yes. Why don’t I?”
 
After the Dathun had finished and the teacher had left, one of the participants told me that the teacher has asked for the lecture on the last day, which wraps up the entire Dathun, to focus on the climate. The participant explained that as a result, the lecturer had linked a particular writing of Chögyam Trungpa—where he calls us to action against the evils of the day—clearly to the climate crisis.
 
Boy, did I feel good! But why does one get angry, another try to impress, and the Teacher listen?

Fucked if I know!
 
Finally…I love your feedback! Someone mentioned that it might be useful to provide tips, on the basis that many people don’t know what to do. Great idea--I’ll provide a tip at the end of each post.
  1. Tip One: Hang up your laundry. “A new study found that dryers are the main source of microfiber pollution into the atmosphere, with each dryer responsible for releasing up to 120 million microplastic fibers into the air each year.” Plus, ,” Air-drying your clothes can reduce the average household’s carbon footprint by a whopping 2,400 pounds a year” (https://www.greenamerica.org/green-living/ditch-your-dryer)
    PLUS, it’s pleasant to hang your clothes outside in the summer and they smell really good. If you hang up your clothes inside in the winter, they will add moisture to the very dry NS winter air, which is good for your skin. Only pluses here. It will soon be a pleasurable habit!  
  

2 Comments
Sean
9/5/2022 08:00:31 pm

Hi Charlotte, I know you want feedback and welcome constructive criticism, so here goes. I'm enjoying your writings, but some of it feels 10 years ago. The climate crisis - and I'm one of those old ones who has been talking about it for a long time - is complex and multi-faceted... it's what people call a 'wicked' problem. It also faces challenges in terms of how to communicate about it. There are ways that work and ways that don't work. (I'd recommend George Marshall's Don't Even Think ABout It). And we need thousands of solutions in thousands of different directions. While I agree that we need all sectors involved - this must move out of the realm of the environment movement - there must also be a social equity side. I've been at climate change work for a long time, but I ain't working next to a neo-nazi, because I also know we need to deal with inequality and environmental racism. It's urgent and complicated and downright scary stuff, but we also have to always, always be strategic.

Reply
Charlotte Mendel
9/7/2022 10:17:09 am

Thank you Sean!

Your message has totally changed the way I am going to write. That is why I genuinely want (need!) feedback—a note of emotion is creeping into my blogs and your message below really clarified that. A few years ago, I stepped into a world of kind, intelligent professionals I hadn’t known existed in NS. Unanimously left politically (at least among the ones I met, and the few exceptions were pariahs) they agreed that climate crisis was a vital issue. Some are fighting valiantly for the cause, as I am trying to do. Some are living utterly conscientious lives. But the majority of them hadn’t modified their lifestyles one iota, and I do NOT differentiate between climate deniers and people who don’t modify their lifestyles, because the planet doesn’t differentiate.
Added to my unpleasant (and ongoing) issues with Dal, I am feeling disillusioned with the left. And I let that stupid emotion creep into my blogs. Bless you Sean, for enabling me to see that. Of course you wouldn’t fight beside a neo-Nazi, and spouting that will actually make 50% of the population dismiss me as a nutter. The exact thing I’m trying to avoid. Furthermore, the extremities of the human body won’t be involved in the fight and I’m not aiming to attract them—I am aiming for the torso. So Nazis won't be fighting and I must drop that extreme kind of language, unless I put a smiley face to indicate it’s humour: it defeats the whole purpose if I alienate any one of my potential readers.

Second, thanks for recommending George Marshall. I get a lot of ideas from these types of recommendations; I got the idea of Eco-terrorism from “Ministry of the Future” and am weaving it into my current book. That was recommended by David Wimberley ( Bless you David!) and I deeply appreciate these kinds of thoughtful recommendations. I would take a course in terrorism, but the only people offering those courses don’t allow women to join (Down, penis envy!😊)

I haven’t had time to read Marshall of course, him but I did get the gist of his ideas from Google—I am going to write to him because it’s quite brilliant. And of course ties in precisely to what I am trying to do, except he has done a ton more research.
1. His ideas about how every individual sees the crisis ”in their own image” and how we have to “open up the partisan divide” and find “new ways to frame the {the climate issue]—yes, yes, that is exactly what I want to learn to do!
2. He says we are wired to ignore the climate crisis (to trigger a war-like reaction, we need an identifiable enemy) but at the same time we have “immense capacity for empathic cooperation”. Brilliant! That is why I am trying to make the climate crisis as sexy an enemy as Voldemort in my writing now. And the people fighting it are identifiable heroes. I strongly believe that writers—who have historically played a role in great societal change—need to change their focus from gloom and doom to a rousing call to action.

There is one area which needs further debate between us, should you want that. You write: “…because I also know we need to deal with inequality and environmental racism.”

So, I would like to ask you two questions:
1. First, if we didn’t manage to solve inequality injustices at the apex of human civilization (the technological, scientific, medicinal explosion of the last 100 years was fuelled by a cheap, plentiful source of energy and will probably never repeat itself. There was also an explosion in social justice--we almost solved world hunger! But alas, now it’s climbing up again…) then why do you think we'll solve it during a crisis? What do you mean when you say that you, “know we need to deal with inequality and environmental racism”? Check out the En-Roads simulator—it reduces your “thousands of solutions” to ONE thing, reducing carbon (and of course the process of doing that comprises thousands of actions, but the first step is identifying not only what we can do on a global level, but also on a personal level). However, if you go more deeply into En-Roads, you can read in-depth equity considerations for each carbon-based action. Sean, if the world reduces its carbon footprint—yes, on the corporate level, but just as importantly, one human at a time—then millions of lives are saved among the world’s poorest. By reducing our personal footprint (signing a few petitions and joining some rallies and voting for change would be nice too) we are contributing directly to saving unprivileged lives. What could be more social justice than that?

But the Canadian left insists on bringing all this other stuff into the mix. I think one of the big mistakes the environmental movement is making is to link climate to a checklist of left-wing values. The

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    I am a writer and I will try to amuse and entertain you with this blog, while provoking thoughts that challenge your existing beliefs. But beliefs only change with dialogue--so trust that I am looking for the truth as much as you are.

    Archives

    April 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Copyright © 2015, Charlotte Mendel. All rights reserved.